When we study the books that our ruling classes have read, we catch a glimpse of the future they are working toward. It turns out that even ruling elites are deeply influenced by the culture they consume, implying that ordinary people can influence said elites.
Why Books Matter
Circles of people around the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) extensively studied The Decline of the West by German historian Oswald Spengler. Others, in particular the American technocratic elite, must have read a number of books from Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series about vast interplanetary civilizations and, moreover, their far-seeing bureaucratic elites.
Once the age of European colonization came to an end, Western men diverted their gaze toward the skies, dreaming of other worlds to discover and conquer, and, above all, to exploit for resources.
The founder of Rhodesia, today’s Zimbabwe, Cecil Rhodes, a British imperialist who was also a rabid homosexual driven by a hatred for women so much that he tried getting as far away from them as possible, already dreamed of exploring space, saying:
“To think of these stars that you see overhead at night, these vast worlds which we can never reach. I would annex the planets if I could; I often think of that. It makes me sad to see them so clear and yet so far.”
Having conquered Earth, men driven by such escapist fantasies could only dream of trading other worlds for profit. The billionaire founder of FedEx, formerly known as Kinko’s, Paul Orfalea, echoed a somewhat similar statement in the 2006 documentary The One Percent directed by Johnson & Johnson heir Jamie Johnson, saying:
“One day I’d like to go to the Moon and look at the planet Earth and say, ‘Wow, there’s part of my portfolio.’”
A vast number of Hollywood movies since 1945 has explored the colonization of space, the arrival of aliens, or the advancement of sentient robots (such as in Terminator; Blade Runner; I, Robot). Movies have also explored the potential dark side of space, such as the discovery of portals to Hell, or the threat of more advanced civilizations that might consume or destroy the Earth, such as in 2005’s War of the Worlds.
In part, Hollywood has served the propaganda efforts of the State. It then becomes clear that we are living in a world driven by the fantasies of greedy men and women looking to replace a still willful population with obedient, programmable robots.
For what is the purpose of replacing human beings with machines, and even giving preference to machines, other than saying that the machines make fewer mistakes, don’t need sleep, and must totally obey their programming, i.e., the perfect slaves for a wealthy elite looking to stay wealthy and in charge. By removing human will, one removes the threat of a human rebellion, e.g., the threat of a bio-human resistance against the robot age.
Musk and Mars
Those working in the robot and space exploration industries, then, are helping their technocratic masters advance humanity’s subjugation to technology.
The resources from space, of course, are what is necessary to build armies of humanoid robots. We don’t even have enough resources to feed 8 billion people comfortably, so landing on planet Mars makes most sense if you plan to mine the nearby asteroid belt, located between Mars and Jupiter, which is dreamed to be full of rare materials, including gold.
Mars would then become a corporate transit hub for our solar system’s resources, though such developments may take centuries, not decades, to materialize.
Another elite book stands out in terms of relevance, namely the book Project Mars by the Dr. Wernher von Braun, the Nazi German rocket scientist. It details of a man elected to be Elon, a sort of governor of Earth responsible for colonizing the planet Mars.
Surely Elon Musk’s mother must have read this book, naming her child after this fictional government position. And strangely, Musk embarked on precisely this mission to fulfill his mother’s dream of colonizing Mars. Elon Musk is already being positioned as the man worth a trillion dollars, the magic man groomed to be leader of the space age, if only the people will follow him.
Although, as in the case of Cecil Rhodes, the drive to get as far away as possible from Earth’s women may be driven by some form of mental depravity, it must be understood that Elon Musk is part of a larger elite network, and not at all the genius individual we are supposed to take him for.
Most of the dreamed fantasy technology that Elon Musk has been trying to sell, such as the Neuralink, doesn’t work at all and wasn’t even new, since previous attempts to link human brains to computers already achieved similar results. Tying the human brain to machinery, of course, doesn’t just mean human minds will control technology, but rather the other way around, namely that the technology will control human behavior.
The goal, again, is not to advance individual human beings but to subjugate humanity in the service of the wealthy elite, by turning men and women who still have some sense of personal agency into willing slave droids.
To understand more, we need to regard the current AI craze in tandem with Neuralink’s attempts, for if we cannot create real Artificial Intelligence, maybe we can plug human brains into robot bodies, such as explored in Hollywood’s RoboCop series, i.e., cyborgs and cybernetic organisms.
To get humanity to accept this elite desire to use technology to subjugate humanity, the space quests need to be phrased in progressive terms. We need an interplanetary civilization, for example, just in case our elites destroy Earth with their greed. And we need universities on Mars to preserve freedom of expression, insofar the technology installed in our brains will still allow us to think.
The Moon Hoax
The idea of a human resistance against the machines has, likewise, been thoroughly explored in Hollywood’s movies, such as in the Terminator series. The development toward machine-operated planets, however, is presented as deterministic, namely, that it would require a time machine to go back in time and prevent SkyNet, or some other main computer, from taking over.
Barring a time machine, of course, these movies suggest that there is nothing we can do about it, and that the bio-human resistance against technology will be wiped out by a robot foot stomping on our skulls.
What remains, then, is whether AI is really intelligent, and whether the U.S. American bet on AI and robots is really going to materialize. There are some caveats, for example.
Having studied the NASA space programs extensively, one must wonder why Elon Musk’s rocket company had to buy Russian rockets to study how they work, because NASA, apparently, forgot about all of their technology that supposedly took men to the moon. I say supposedly because the evidence of the Apollo moon landings overwhelmingly points toward fraud.
In 1968, NASA director James E. Webb resigned from his position as Administrator, because he believed NASA wouldn’t be able to put a man on the moon. At the time, NASA’s industrial supply chain partners were scattered around the nation, and the parts that were supposed to be put together either didn’t arrive, didn’t fit, or couldn’t even be produced at all.
Keeping the space industry scattered, of course, would later serve a divide-and-conquer tactic. Indeed, a year later, new NASA leadership somehow landed on the moon anyway and did in 12 months what James Webb thought couldn’t be done in thirty years.
Ultimately, the technology called front projection, used on the set of Stanley Kubrik’s Space Odyssey 2001, was simply reused to film the moon hoax. The most shocking aspect of this claim isn’t that Americans faked the moon landings, but rather that even today, in 2025, we aren’t able to take people to the moon and back, for the technology still doesn’t exist.
Due to the Cold War conflict, which was really a conflict between two competing superpowers, the U.S. State Department had an aggressive interest in dominating space, to demoralize the Russians, and consolidate American status. After all, the most famously American adagio goes, fake it until you make it. Well, they faked it, and they’re still trying to make it.
People often complain that if the Apollo moon landings had been faked, at least some high-profile people involved in the scam would have spoken up. And that, indeed, they did:
Bill Kaysing was a technical writer for Rocketdyne, NASA’s rocket engine supplier, and he extensively exposed the hoax as early as 1976. Astronaut Gus Grissom once called the Apollo launch capsule a “bucket of bolts”, and thought the rocket and its equipment were so faulty it couldn’t even take anyone into lower orbit.
So it makes sense that Musk had to study Russian rockets—Americans never went to space until the development of the Space Shuttle which, however, could only take passengers to lower orbit, to the International Space Station at the edge of Earth’s atmosphere, not to actual outer space, and nowhere near the moon.
Why didn’t we ever build a Space Station that could comfortably float between Earth and the Moon? Too risky, or because we don’t know how to do it? For further reading, one of the best books on the Moon Hoax is called One Small Step?: The Great Moon Hoax and the Race to Dominate Earth from Space by German journalist Gerhard Wisnewski.
The Fake Economy
The moon hoax, however, is but a small footnote in the far greater story of vast, civilization-wide economic trickery.
Our Western economies aren’t real, nor are most of the office jobs. A lot of jobs serve to trap people in busy-ness, i.e., activities meant to prevent people from revolting against the state. You work just enough hours to tire you, but not too many for you to decide to quit. You are paid just enough to live, but not enough to escape.
What I’m trying to explain is that people in Western societies aren’t free to develop their personal life trajectories. The State acts as a feudal lordship that, through passive and indirect controls, i.e., by setting and aggressively guarding the boundaries of individual freedom, forces people to direct much of their waking energy toward State goals, such as, the U.S. domination of Earth and Space.
American journalist H.L. Mencken phrased it as follows when referring to the outcome of the American Civil War,
“The American people, North and South, went into the war as citizens of their respective states, they came out as subjects...”
Have you not noticed, for example, that most rich people in the American-led West are boomers, and that those boomers have very specific interests? Their primary concern is extending their lives, staying young and healthy, and having, therefore, access to an array of boomer-positive technology such as stair lifts, exoskeletons, organ transplants, service droids, low-cost immigrant labor, and household robots.
Indeed, the Western world has completely and entirely arranged its economies to serve the interests of the old, at the total and fullest expense of the younger generations whose futures are being devoured to keep the elderly, who produce nothing, comfortably alive. This is what should be known as the Great Hoax, namely the idea that technological progress is supposed to advance humanity when, in reality, it only serves to extend boomer longevity.
Have you not seen, for example, the super old people in American politics refusing to retire, holding on to their jobs as though they were holding on to life?
While the young aren’t able to buy homes to start families, in the USA, the largest group of home buyers is now over 70 years old. Instead of passing their wealth on to their already millennial and even Gen X children still struggling to buy a home, the boomers would rather spend all their money on 15-year-long end-of-life cruises to see the world.
Younger people waiting to receive their inheritance should adjust their expectations, for if the boomers don’t burn their cash themselves, the state will rob the inheritance with a 100% tax, in order to afford the aspirations of other boomer elites.
We are not dealing with an issue of this or that political system, democracy versus fascism, or liberalism versus puritanism, but rather, we are dealing with a criminal and greedy elite that owns the whole economy and has no real vision for the future survival of their people.
The Bio-Human Resistance
Not only have working-class White natives of Western countries already been replaced by immigrant service populations (reducing the cost of boomer maintenance while still increasing rents and lowering relative wages), but now even immigrants might get replaced with robots and algorithms.
The economy is fake because it doesn’t—at all—service the healthier interests of a people looking to preserve its long-term survival. If technological developments, including space exploration, only serve to create robots that boomers might one day transfer their brains into, so that they can live forever, then we should wonder why the young haven’t revolted against their elders yet?
Where is the bio-human resistance against technocracy? The answer is, of course, democracy. The old people over 50 are now electoral majorities in nearly every Western country, and will remain so for at least another 20 years, despite mass immigration of younger people.
So, let me recap what is going on here:
we are presently waging war in Eastern Ukraine to secure there the raw materials needed for AI, robots, and space exploration (in a proxy war competing against China);
we are colonizing space to then mine the resources found among the asteroid belt and beyond, in order to build the massive armies of hundreds of millions of household and military robots;
we have totally arranged our economies and our technological developments in the service of extending the longevity of the boomer generations;
and we are devouring the younger native White generations in the process;
Elon Musk believes that in 20 years, there will be more humanoid robots than humans walking the Earth, but this dream can only materialize by an extreme reduction of human child births, for the resources directed toward robotics will be taken away from what is needed to birth and rear human children.
The End
Clearly, something may easily go wrong. Namely, we will either run out of resources or we will run out of energy to acquire them. Of course, both of these scenarios will happen at the same time, for what we are experiencing now is really a psychological process: Elderly people, so afraid of death, i.e., thanatophobic, that they are using all their means to pretend that they can be young again and live forever.
This process comes to its natural end when the boomer generations naturally die off anyway, and the most insecure, selfish generation of all Western history must lie in its grave.
Once the boomer generation dies off, the high demand for resources, energy, immigrants and robots will collapse overnight as the younger generations realize they can do with a lot less now that the burden of care of their elders has disappeared.
The lesson here is that much of what we call technology is really only there to support elderly people, and that technology itself, therefore, is a symptom of dying civilizations. After the death of such dying civilizations, the survivors shall reorganize themselves closer to nature. The survivors will find that religion and spirituality, once again, will serve them better.
Every dwindling end brings forth a vigorous new beginning. And so instead of a Space Age we should be preparing for a new Heroic Age, namely here, on planet Earth.
